🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a bill raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," said the MEP behind the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and fit for children," commented a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local government level amid federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.